The cross-platform compatibility problems really have nothing to do with Adobe fonts themselves. Font handling is problematic when you go beyond simple typography and fonts that have only four faces - regular, italic, bold, and bold italic. In terms of cross-platform compatibility, with Microsoft Word, Excel, and Powerpoint, forget about it. More strangely, when I go into the actual 'Font' dialog box, the font is set to bold - even when I create a brand new document and try to use the Adobe Caslon Pro font, first thing. The only difference between the generic PDF and the Adobe PDF appear to be optimization of the fonts embedded in the PDF files. I know that the regular Adobe Caslon Pro font is installed on my machine, as it shows up just fine in other programs. ![]() In terms of functionality, I don't see the problems you are experiencing. I also created a PDF file from the “print” dialog using the “save as Adobe PDF” function (lower left corner of the dialog box), also attached. ![]() I created a PDF file using “save as PDF” from Word's own “save” dialog, also attached. ![]() We are not aware of any problems using Adobe Caslon Pro with Microsoft Word 2011 on the Macintosh.Īttached is a sample Word document that I created using Word 2011 (with all latest updates from Microsoft), four styles of Adobe Caslon Pro with all OpenType features enabled. Adobe Caslon Pro is the right choice for magazines, journals, book publishing, and corporate communications. Something definitely doesn't sound right here. For her Caslon revival, designer Carol Twombly studied specimen pages printed by William Caslon between 17.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |